Comparison

AI Meeting Note Takers Compared in 2026

Last updated May 2026. We ran 60 real meetings (sales calls, customer interviews, standups, 1:1s, all-hands) through eight AI note takers. We pay full price for every subscription and earn affiliate commission if you sign up through our links.

Quick verdict: there is no single winner. The best AI meeting note taker depends on whether you join meetings as a bot or capture them locally, whether your stack is Zoom, Google Meet, or Teams, and whether the people on the other side are okay with a recording bot in the room. Our overall pick for solo professionals in 2026 is Granola, which captures audio locally and produces clean notes without joining the meeting as a bot. For sales teams, Gong is still the leader. For internal teams who want a low-friction shared tool, Fireflies wins on price and integrations.

Below we walk through each tool, what it does well, and where it falls short.

Our ranking

Rank Tool Best for Pricing
1GranolaSolo professionals, no-bot capture$18 / month Pro
2GongSales teamsCustom, ~$1500 / user / year
3Fireflies.aiInternal teams on a budget$10-19 / user / month
4Otter.aiLive transcription in Zoom and Meet$10-20 / user / month
5FathomFree tier, solo useFree, $19 Premium
6tldvRecordings library, async sharing$29 / user / month
7FellowMeeting hygiene plus notes$11 / user / month
8Zoom AI CompanionFree if you already pay for ZoomFree with Zoom paid plan

Sources: vendor pricing pages, retrieved May 2026.

The single most important question

Before you pick a tool, decide: are you okay with a recording bot joining your meetings, or do you want the capture to happen on your machine?

Bot-based tools (Otter, Fireflies, Fathom, tldv, Gong, Fellow) join the meeting as a participant. Everyone sees the bot in the participant list. This is fine for most internal meetings and most sales calls. It can be awkward in customer interviews, executive meetings, or any context where the people on the other side did not opt in.

Local-capture tools (Granola, Zoom AI Companion when used by the host only) record from your microphone and speaker output. Nobody on the other end sees a bot. This matters more than people expect, especially for external meetings.

If you only need internal meetings, the bot vs local question is mostly aesthetic. For external meetings, especially in regulated industries or with privacy-conscious counterparts, local capture removes a meaningful objection.

1. Granola

Granola is a desktop app that captures the audio on your machine and pairs it with the rough notes you type during the meeting. After the meeting, it generates a clean summary that combines what you typed with what was said. The output quality is the best we tested for the "I want notes I will actually read later" use case.

The reason it sits at the top: zero friction. You open Granola, the meeting happens, the notes are ready when you close the call. You do not invite anyone, you do not log into a separate tool, you do not chase down a recording. The pricing ($18 per month) is fair for the quality. The only real downside is that it is desktop-only (Mac and Windows; no mobile capture), which is fine if you take meetings at a computer and a problem if you take them on the go.

Try Granola if you take most of your meetings at a desk.

2. Gong

Gong is the category-defining tool for sales teams. It joins calls, transcribes, identifies talk patterns, scores deals, surfaces risk signals, and integrates with every CRM. The output goes far beyond meeting notes; Gong is a revenue intelligence platform with note-taking as one feature.

For non-sales teams, Gong is overkill and overpriced (estimated $1500 per user per year in 2026). For sales teams above five reps, the analytics make it the right choice. The competition has caught up on note-taking quality; nobody has caught up on the deal-stage analytics layer.

3. Fireflies.ai

Fireflies is the budget-friendly bot-based tool. It joins your Zoom, Meet, or Teams meeting, transcribes, summarizes, and pushes notes to Slack, Notion, or your CRM. The integrations list is the longest of any tool we tested. The summaries are competent. The price is the lowest of any team-grade option ($10-19 per user per month).

Where Fireflies loses to the top two is in the quality of the structured output. Action items are sometimes wrong, speaker labels drift on group calls, and the summary tends toward generic. For an internal team that needs notes shared automatically, it is fine. For external-facing or high-stakes meetings, we use one of the top two.

4. Otter.ai

Otter is the original AI transcription tool and still the best for live transcription. The text appears in real time, accuracy is excellent, and you can search across all your past meetings. Otter Pilot joins meetings as a bot and produces summaries; the summaries are competent but not class-leading.

The reason Otter sits at fourth and not higher is the strategic positioning. Otter is excellent at transcripts and competent at notes; the modern winners in this category (Granola, Gong) are excellent at notes and treat transcripts as a side-effect. If you need raw transcripts (legal discovery, journalism, accessibility), Otter is the right tool. If you need usable notes, the rankings above beat it.

5. Fathom

Fathom has a generous free tier (unlimited recordings on Zoom, Meet, and Teams) and a $19 Premium plan that adds team features. The free tier is the only legitimately useful free meeting note taker we have used, and the quality is good enough for most solo professionals.

Fathom sits at fifth, not higher, because the bot-based approach has the same friction as Otter and Fireflies, and because the structured-output quality is one notch below Granola for solo use. If you cannot or will not pay, Fathom is the right pick. If you can pay $18 for Granola, that is the better tool.

6. tldv

tldv records your meetings, builds a searchable library, and lets you share clips. The library is the differentiator: tldv treats your meeting history as an asset you can search later. If you do customer research and want to revisit specific moments across hundreds of interviews, tldv is the right tool.

The note quality is good but not class-leading. The pricing ($29 per user per month) is on the high side for what you get unless the library use case matters to you.

7. Fellow

Fellow is two products in one: a meeting hygiene tool (agendas, prep notes, action items) and an AI note taker. The hygiene side is genuinely useful for managers who want to enforce structure on recurring meetings. The note-taking side is competent but not the reason to choose the product.

If you are a manager who already wants meeting hygiene tooling, Fellow is the right pick because the AI notes come for free with the rest of the product. If you only want notes, the tools above are better.

8. Zoom AI Companion

Zoom AI Companion is included with Zoom Pro and above. It produces meeting summaries, action items, and chapters. The quality is fine for internal meetings and the price is unbeatable (free if you already pay for Zoom).

The reason it sits at the bottom is reach: it only works inside Zoom. If your meetings are split across Zoom, Meet, and Teams, you need a tool that crosses platforms. If you live in Zoom and want zero additional spend, AI Companion is the right answer.

Task-by-task winners

TaskWinnerRunner-up
Sales call coachingGongFireflies
Customer interview notesGranolatldv
Internal standup summariesFirefliesZoom AI Companion
1:1 notesGranolaFellow
All-hands recaptldvFathom
Live transcriptionOtterZoom AI Companion
Free tierFathomZoom AI Companion
External meetings (no bot)GranolaLocal recording plus Whisper

How to pick in 90 seconds

  1. If you sell for a living and your team is on a CRM: Gong, full stop. The deal analytics pay for themselves.
  2. If you take a lot of external meetings and a recording bot is awkward: Granola.
  3. If you want the cheapest team-grade tool with the most integrations: Fireflies.
  4. If you live in Zoom and do not want to pay extra: Zoom AI Companion.
  5. If you cannot pay anything: Fathom's free tier.
  6. If you need transcripts more than notes: Otter.
  7. If you want a searchable library of past meetings: tldv.
  8. If you are a manager who wants structured meeting hygiene: Fellow.

Things to know before you adopt one

  1. Two-party consent states require notification when recording. Most tools handle this with an audio prompt; check that yours does. Confirm your local laws.
  2. The AI summary is a starting point, not a final document. We have caught hallucinated commitments ("Sarah agreed to send the contract by Friday" when Sarah said no such thing) on every tool we tested. Review before sharing.
  3. Speaker identification is unreliable on calls with three or more participants. The transcripts are still useful; the speaker labels are not.
  4. The integrations layer matters more than the AI quality once you scale. A tool with worse summaries that posts to Slack automatically beats a better tool that requires a copy-paste.

Bottom line

For most readers, the right answer is one of three tools: Granola for solo professionals who want frictionless capture, Gong for sales teams who need analytics, or Fireflies for internal teams who need shared notes on a budget. The other five tools have specific strengths that may make them the right choice for narrow use cases, but the headline picks cover 80% of readers in 2026.

Try Granola first if you take most of your meetings at a desk. If you are evaluating bot-based options, Fireflies.ai has the best price-to-features ratio.

Frequently asked questions

Can I run any of these locally without sending audio to the cloud?

Most tools send audio to the cloud for transcription. Granola does the recording locally but processes the transcript and summary in the cloud. For fully local capture and processing, you need a self-hosted Whisper plus a local LLM, which is a real project; we may cover this in a future article.

How do these compare to the AI features built into Notion or Slack?

Notion AI and Slack AI are good at summarizing existing text. They do not capture meetings. The tools in this list capture audio, which is the harder problem.

What about using ChatGPT or Claude to summarize a recording I already have?

Works fine for one-off use. Upload the transcript or audio, ask for a summary. The dedicated tools win on integrations and on the structured output (action items, decisions, follow-ups), not on the raw summarization quality.

Will my meeting notes be used to train the AI model?

Depends on the vendor and the plan. Most consumer plans allow training by default with an opt-out; most enterprise plans guarantee no training. Read the privacy policy of the tool you choose, especially if your meetings touch confidential client data.

Which tool integrates with my CRM?

Gong, Fireflies, Otter, and Fathom all integrate with the major CRMs (Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive). Granola and tldv have lighter CRM integrations as of May 2026. Check the current integrations page for each tool.

Why is Otter not in the top three anymore?

Otter is still the best at live transcription. The market for AI meeting tools has matured beyond transcription; the winners now are tools that produce structured, useful notes, not transcripts. Otter has not kept pace on that dimension.

Affiliate disclosure. As an affiliate we may earn a commission from purchases made through links on this page, at no additional cost to you. Our editorial decisions are independent of these relationships.

Get the no-hype AI weekly

Every Tuesday: one honest review, one tool worth your money, one trap to skip. No fluff.